5/5 Edisa 8 months ago on Google • 230 reviews
Cluedo
dinner
not
recommended
for
role
players,
but
as
a
show
or
for
company.
Role
play
characters:
⭐️⭐️🌚🌚🌚
(little
interaction
between
us)
Character
story:
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Research
Actress
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Very
annoying
butler
actor
🌚
Spectacular
dinner
👌⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️👌
Research
tests:
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Way
to
get
clues:
⭐️⭐️🌚🌚🌚
Att
to
the
client
before
the
dinner:
⭐️⭐️🌚
They
did
not
explain
the
methodology
well
and
I
was
disappointed
because
of
it.
🤔
EXPLANATION:
🍽
To
begin
with,
they
separated
us
into
different
tables,
where
you
sat
with
the
group
that
had
come
and
that
was
not
what
was
proposed
to
me
in
relation
to
the
client,
my
intention
was
to
develop
my
character
and
role-play
with
the
other
characters.
Otherwise,
why
do
they
give
us
roles
and
secrets?
Why
are
we
encouraged
to
create
a
character?
For
me
the
game
was
too
directed
by
the
Butler🤵♂️
who
did
not
allow
us
to
role
play
with
the
rest
of
the
diners,
the
🕵♀️Researcher
did
it
much
better
and
allowed
us
to
role
play,
even
if
we
were
sitting
at
different
tables.
The
Butler🤵♂️
explained
the
life
of
each
character
without
letting
them
speak...
the
truth
is
that
it
seemed
disrespectful
to
me
and
I
made
him
shut
up
on
several
occasions
while
playing
my
character
😡🤬😡
MEAL:
As
for
the
food,
it
was
delicious🤤🤤🤤🤤
with
exquisite
service.
Despite
there
having
been
a
problem
with
Excel,
they
changed
it
without
problems
🥰
and
that
touched
my
heart
❤️
I
really
enjoyed
it,
even
though
there
were
breaks
between
courses,
since
my
belly
usually
growls.
Luckily
I
endured
it
well
and
didn't
owe
anyone
🤣
INVESTIGATION:
I
thought
it
was
something
great
and
very
cool
🥰
to
be
able
to
investigate
like
a
detective
🕵
the
enigmas,
the
possible
suspects
and
the
weapons
used.
TRACKS:
Here
would
have
been
a
good
time
to
roleplay
with
each
other,
but
the
game
was
about
buying
clues
and
trading
them.
RESOLUTION:
We
were
a
group
of
3
and
we
managed
to
solve
the
puzzle
before
anyone
else,
because
the
questions
were:
1.
Who
killed?
2.
Why?
To
which
we
answered
correctly,
but
we
were
INVALIDATED
😱
due
to
lack
of
information
about
something
irrelevant
that
was
not
necessary
to
know,
since
it
was
a
secret,
but
it
was
not
important
to
answer
the
questions
asked🤦♀️🤷♀️
And
when
the
case
was
resolved,
it
was
exactly
what
we
had
said,
so
we
didn't
really
understand
why
we
were
told
that
something
was
missing
when
it
was
not
relevant
to
solving
the
case
and
our
answers
answered
the
questions
posed.
As
stated,
I
didn't
think
about
repeating
it,
but
the
universe
is
going
to
put
me
back
thanks
to
the
HR
department
of
my
company
🤣
Will
I
finally
kill
the
butler
🤵♂️?
Or
will
I
let
him
live?
I
just
hope
it's
less
burdensome🙏
Family
photon
😍
Thank
you.
Updated
for
COMPANY:
THEY
LET
8
COMPANIONS
ROLE
and
that's
what
I
would
have
liked
for
paying
€55.
I
really
would
have
liked
to
be
one
of
those
who
acted
🥲
Obviously
we
have
won
because
of
my
pride
already
🤣
No,
actually
it
was
because
I
was
already
playing
with
an
advantage
by
knowing
a
little
about
the
methodology,
but
it
would
be
nice
if
the
rules
for
writing
✍️
what
it
says
on
the
suspect
card
were
said
before.
I
liked
the
topic
of
pointing
on
the
sheet
🍃
much
more
than
in
the
previous
one,
I
recommend
that
you
continue
doing
this
methodology.
Thank
you.
