3/5 Clio F. 4 months ago on Google • 49 reviews
So
sad
to
write
this
review.
I
had
wanted
to
visit
this
place
steeped
in
history
for
several
years.
Although
aware
that
it
was
very
'simple'
I
was
sadly
disappointed.
Mainly
because
I
think
there
is
room
for
improvement.
Once
through
the
gate
it
is
not
very
clear
where
you
have
to
pass
and
there
were
several
fenced
off
areas.
Once
we
found
the
path,
however,
we
came
across
several
dogs,
all
of
which
were
always
loose,
a
couple
of
which
came
up
to
us
and
jumped
on
our
trousers,
making
them
dirty.
I
have
a
dog,
that's
not
the
problem.
But
if
I
were
a
person
who
was
afraid
of
dogs,
I
wouldn't
like
free
dogs,
on
a
historical
site,
especially
when
there
are
vast
areas
of
countryside
around
for
them
to
run
and
play.
The
owners
were
all
locals
and
despite
calling
the
dogs
back
none
of
them
returned
to
the
owner.
So
as
well
as
being
careful
not
to
step
in
cow/goat
droppings,
you
have
to
be
careful
of
dog
droppings
too.
Another
small
sore
point
is
the
dirt
around
and
even
inside
the
site.
Such
an
important
heritage,
I
believe,
should
be
preserved,
perhaps
with
more
rules,
especially
if
people
are
unable
to
do
so
themselves.
8 people found this review helpful 👍