2/5 Julia Polozova (. 2 years ago on Google
Uh-oh,
controversial!
The
feeling
that
I
had
during
the
dinner
can
be
described
by
the
word
uncertainty.
I
was
recommended
Tinto
for
ages,
yet
I'm
entering
an
empty
restaurant.
At
first
glance
every
menu
position
looks
intriguing
and
interesting,
but
I'm
not
sure
reality
keeps
up.
Positives:
Wine
collection
and
its
treatment.
-
Quite
impressive,
loved
how
every
wine
was
handled,
there
are
some
unique
choices
on
the
wine
card.
Service
-
impressively
attentive,
separate
gratitude
to
the
waiter
we
had
at
the
dinner
who
asked
questions
with
care
about
the
restaurant.
Negatives:
Unfortunately,
all
the
food
I
had
that
day.
Wine
desk:
Strangely
matched
flavours,
not
exactly
true
to
the
menu.
Scandinavian
gravlax,
Mediterranean
notes
in
olive
tapenade,
Italian
flavours
of
dried
tomatoes
and
meats,
goose
livers
and
Asian
notes
in
panko
covered
oyster
mushrooms
do
not
pair
as
well
as
they
sound
and
taste
separately.
It
definitely
felt
and
looked
like
multiple
dishes
on
one
plate.
Duck
ravioli:
now,
all
the
issues
were
masterfully
covered
with
apricot
and
radish.
Despite
the
chef
trying
to
convince
me
that
it
was
indeed
pasta
dough,
it
is,
unfortunately,
not.
The
ravioli
had
distinctive
cracks
and
were
pale
white,
which
tells
me
that
only
one
type
of
flour
was
used,
and
that
spoiled
the
taste
completely.
While
I
appreciate
the
attempt
of
telling
me
what
homemade,
al
dente
pasta
tastes
like,
this
is
not
it.
It
is
homemade
dough,
but
it
is
most
certainly
not
pasta
dough.
Looks
pretty
on
the
photo
though,
so
hey.
In
conclusion,
fancy
for
the
sake
of
fancy,
fusion
just
because
diversity
is
praised
are
not
a
great
strategies.
5
stars
for
the
wine,
0.5
for
the
food.
If
the
restaurant
is
empty,
there
must
be
a
reason
to
that
other
that
'customers'
lack
of
culinary
knowledge'.
This
is
absolutely
the
chef's
issue,
the
staff
is
doing
their
best.
2 people found this review helpful 👍