2/5 Morta D. 6 months ago on Google
I
was
hoping
to
spend
my
Sunday
gazing
into
the
works
of
Marlene
Dumas,
but
instead
my
day
was
ruined.
There
was
no
clear
warning
on
the
website
of
the
Museum,
nor
was
I
informed
at
the
tickets
office,
when
I
asked
for
a
ticket
to
see
Marlene
Dumas.
Upon
further
investigation,
you
could
eventually
see
that
the
museum's
collection
was
closed,
which
I
eventually
realized,
had
the
works
of
Marlene
Dumas
in
it.
In
my
opinion
this
information
should
be
more
accessible
and
more
visible
for
pseudointelectuals
like
me.
I
do
not
have
any
idea
of
who
curated
the
current
expositions,
that
were
on
display
at
the
moment,
but
I
have
never
seen
anything
more
atrocious
in
my
life.
Please
hire
some
people
who
actually
know
how
to
do
their
job,
because
this
was
just
embarrassing.
I
started
my
museum
visit
with
the
chair
exhibition.
I
thought
the
chairs
themselves
were
lovely,
but
I
did
miss
a
few
classics.
Although
the
way,
in
which
the
chairs
were
displayed
was
just
horrible
to
say
the
least.
It
looked
as
if
the
space
was
designed
firstly
and
only
then
the
curators
would
put
the
chairs
just
wherever.
Sure
I
did
enjoy
the
chair-print
wallpaper,
the
metal
piping
display
but
I
thought
it
was
extremely
poorly
executed.
The
first
room
was
OK,
the
second
was
bad
and
the
third,
fourth
and
so
on
was
a
total
abomination
-
the
information
about
the
design
of
the
chairs
was
clashing
so
hard
with
the
chair-print
wallpaper
my
head
started
to
hurt,
the
information
about
the
designs
was
displayed
very
stupidly
-
at
the
floor
of
the
platform
-
you
could
not
read
it
if
there
was
a
lot
of
people
around
and
my
neck
started
hurting
at
the
end
of
the
exposition
even
though
I
am
only
23.
I
could
not
imagine
what
did
it
feel
like
for
people
my
parent's
age;
the
chairs
were
exhibited
very
awkwardly,
messily,
were
mushed
togheter
and
were
not
photogenic
at
all
-
some
of
them
were
even
shown
on
platforms
made
out
of
steel
piping
more
than
3
meters
above
the
ground,
which
I
found
very
stupid,
since
not
even
Dutch
people
are
that
tall.
Going
trough
the
rooms
looked
like
the
coordinators
lost
their
interest
in
this
exhibition
more
and
more
and
at
the
end
there
was
another
totally
random
exhibition
which
had
no
connection
to
the
previous.
Anyways,
I
thought
it
was
quite
embarrassing,
it
did
not
feel
that
the
museum
treated
each
chair
as
a
work
of
art,
but
rather
just
wanted
to
make
some
money.
Going
onwards,
on
the
first
floor
I
had
witnessed
the
most
horrendous
expo
I
have
seen
in
my
life,
sincerely.
I
was
wondering,
was
art
in
Eastern
and
Western
Europe
so
different?
Do
I
not
know
anything
about
contemporary
art?
Was
it
supposed
to
look
that
bad?
so
bad
I
could
not
believe
that
the
museum
would
allow
this?
But
after
googling
the
artist's
name,
some
things
started
to
make
sense.
Turns
out
Manon
Uphoff
is
not
a
visual,
but
a
writer.
Not
even
one
painting
shows
up
in
the
search
when
firstly
googling
her
name.
I
have
no
Idea
what
she
writes
about,
but
I
think
she
should
stick
to
writing
and
leave
the
museum
space
for
people
who
actually
deserve
it.
Lastly,
I
did
find
the
work
of
Pauline
Curnier
Jardin
interesting,
but
I
was
still
baffled
by
what
I
had
seen
previously
and
could
not
concentrate.
Once
again,
the
information
about
the
work
was
unreadable
in
some
rooms
due
to
the
red
lighting.
I
don't
think
It's
a
problem
that's
hard
to
fix,
but
it
looks
very
unprofessional.
Thank
you
for
your
time
please
take
note
of
my
observations
and
have
a
nice
day.