1/5 Carmelo R. 9 months ago on Google
People
inside
this
building
make
absurd
laws.
Privatization
of
education
is
one
of
them.
I
have
taken
biology
and
chemistry
exams
twice,
with
different
exam
boards,
because
it
was
my
intention
to
study
biomedical
science.
I
studied
hard
for
many
hours
a
day
every
day
to
obtain
excellent
grades
and
performed
well
in
every
exam
but
I
was
awarded
no
grades
(Us).
Two
months
after
taking
exams,
students
are
all
awarded
Us.
Exam
boards
state
that
the
person
who
viewed
the
answers
made
a
mistake.
They
say
that
another
person
must
view
the
answers
to
award
them
the
right
grades.
They
steal
students’
money
by
stating
that
answers
must
be
viewed
many
times.
The
word
“review”
is
used
to
hide
the
fact
that
grades
are
awarded
in
exchange
of
money.
Exam
boards
sell
grades
because
they
are
private
commercial
companies.
The
more
money
they
receive,
the
better
students’
grades
will
be.
Despite
their
huge
profits,
they
are
registered
as
charities
to
dodge
taxes.
Grades
should
have
been
included
in
the
expensive
fees
I
had
paid
to
sit
exams.
Students
have
to
pay
expensive
exam
fees
to
take
exams
because
further
education
is
monopolized
by
private
commercial
companies.
I
was
awarded
two
Us
because
I
did
not
buy
grades.
Although
I
proved
universities
that
grades
are
sold,
they
adamantly
refused
to
accept
me.
It
is
evidence
that
universities’
admission
departments
and
exam
boards
work
together.
If
students
do
not
buy
grades,
they
are
not
accepted.
A
few
people
study
biology
and
chemistry
at
A-Level
because
it
is
very
expensive
to
buy
grades
in
these
subjects.
As
a
result,
the
NHS
has
a
chronic
shortage
of
personnel.
Poaching
doctors
from
poor
nations
is
unethical
and
it
is
not
the
solution
to
this
problem.
The
government
privatized
education
to
save
money
but
it
pays
for
students’
tuition
fees.
This
is
a
paradox.
If
the
government
owned
sixth
form
colleges
and
universities,
it
would
save
a
lot
of
money.
Additionally,
the
NHS
would
not
have
a
chronic
shortage
of
medical
staff
because
studious
people,
indigenous
and
foreigners,
would
attend
British
medical
schools.
Moreover,
doctors
would
not
misdiagnose
diseases.
Universities
are
private
institutions
(de
facto).
A
university
degree
costs
ÂŁ9,250
because
the
government
does
not
own
universities.
They
are
considered
public
institutions
(de
jure)
because
the
government
pays
for
students’
university
fees.
Medicine
and
dentistry
are
the
most
expensive
courses.
For
this
reason,
the
government
limits
places
in
medical
schools
(numerus
clausus).
If
the
government
owned
universities,
numerus
clausus
would
be
useless.
If
there
were
no
numerus
clausus
in
medical
schools,
the
NHS
would
not
have
a
chronic
shortage
of
doctors.
Rich
people
only
can
buy
3
As
in
order
to
enroll
in
medical
schools.
UCAT
exams
are
managed
by
private
commercial
companies.
Admission
to
medical
school
is
based
on
money
only,
not
on
knowledge
and
mental
skills.
Unfortunately,
private
education
has
a
detrimental
effect
on
people’s
health
and
lives.
The
NHS
has
to
pay
billions
of
pounds
every
year
in
compensation
because
private
education
produces
incompetent
doctors.
If
education
were
nationalized,
the
NHS
would
save
billions
of
pounds
as
doctors
would
not
misdiagnose
diseases.
Furthermore,
“mickey
mouse
degrees”
would
disappear.
I
think
that
European
universities
do
not
accept
British
A-Levels
because
they
are
issued
by
private
commercial
companies.
In
the
other
European
nations,
there
are
no
exam
boards
because
academic
certificates
are
awarded
by
sixth
form
colleges
themselves
on
behalf
of
governments.
If
A-Levels
were
public
qualifications,
the
logo
of
the
government
(Dieu
et
mon
droit)
would
appear
on
certificates.
I
am
not
the
only
person
complaining
about
the
fact
that
education
is
monopolized
by
private
entities.
There
is
no
meritocracy
if
education
is
private.
Meritocracy
is
in
public
institutions
only.
5 people found this review helpful đź‘Ť