1/5 Larry y. 6 months ago on Google
This
store
does
not
have
a
restroom
available
for
use.
When
asked
for
a
restroom,
the
response
from
the
manager
was
to
use
the
restroom
across
the
“street”.
The
“street”
happens
to
be
Eumundi
Noosa
Road
on
a
Friday
afternoon.
It
is
4
lanes
of
very
busy
traffic
and
the
store
is
between
2
very
busy
traffic
circles.
Even
negotiating
the
parking
lot
was
challenging.
We
purchased
food
and
drink
for
our
group
of
14.
After
eating
we
tried
to
find
a
location
on
the
same
side
of
the
street
as
KFC
but
the
manger
was
right.
There
are
none.
As
part
of
our
group
we
had
our
grandparents
and
one
and
another
of
our
group
had
no
option.
They
needed
a
restroom.
The
next
thing
I
see
is
our
76
year
old
grandparent
trying
to
make
it
across
all
4
lanes
of
traffic.
Important
note:
There
are
NO
crosswalks
or
any
type
of
traffic
control
in
this
area.
Thank
GOD,
he
made
it
both
directions
without
being
ran
down.
The
traffic
is
very
fast
and
it
probably
would
not
be
the
fault
of
the
driver
but
rather
the
fault
of
the
KFC
store
that
resulted
in
him
being
forced
to
to
cross
4
lanes
of
traffic
just
to
use
the
restroom.
How
does
KFC
which
purports
to
be
responsible
part
of
the
community
allow
this
to
happen?
Whether
or
not
it
is
allowed
by
the
city
code
doesn’t
matter.
What
matters
is
whether
or
not
your
brand
is
knowingly
putting
people
in
danger.
This
is
a
family
restaurant.
What
happens
when
a
mother
of
2
or
3
kinds
tries
to
cross
those
4
lanes
and
the
unthinkable
happens.
Who
is
responsible
then?
