1/5 Lisa R. 6 months ago on Google
I
would
love
to
write
a
glowing
review
about
the
dining
experience
we'd
been
looking
forward
to
for
months;
instead,
I
have
only
disappointment
to
express
and
a
lesson
learned
that
price
does
not
always
equate
to
quality.
Firstly,
the
service.
No
one
could
say
it
was
lacking
on
any
level
except...
well...
'pleasantness.'
The
formality
one
would
expect
was
a
little
too
over
the
top
for
comfort
except,
bizarrely,
that
everyone,
including
the
well-suited
sommelier,
was
wearing
gym
shoes.
Not
'fashion
sneakers,'
but
runners
or
cross-trainers.
If
you're
going
to
make
me
uncomfortable
with
your
cool,
unpleasant
demeanour,
at
least
wear
nice
shoes.
The
champagne
cart
was
rolled
over
to
our
table,
and
its
bearer
launched
into
a
long
and
very
detailed
explanation
of
the
tasting
notes
of
the
two
($45
or
$55/glass)
offerings.
We
declined,
stating
neither
of
us
was
fond
of
champagne,
for
which
we
received
a
condescending
remark
about
'wasting
his
breath.'
Had
he
started
with,
"Would
you
like
to
hear
about
our
champagne?"
we
could
have
opted
out
before
he
started
rather
than,
I
guess,
have
been
expected
to
interrupt
his
spiel.
Our
decline
of
wine-pairing
was
also
met
with
an
uncomfortable
remark
to
the
effect
of
'taking
our
chances'
by
choosing
our
own
wines.
In
retrospect,
that
may
have
been
related
to
the
fact
that
unbeknownst
to
us,
this
'French'
restaurant
would
be
serving
so
many
courses
of
Asian
fish
dishes.
Each
of
the
courses
was
deposited
on
the
candle-less,
flower-less,
spartan
table
by
a
different
person,
most
of
whom
rushed
through
each
description
with
a
demeanour
that
seemed
to
foreshadow
how
bland
and
tasteless
most
of
them
would
sadly
be.
None
of
the
aforementioned
would
matter
much
had
the
food
been
even
close
to
what
it
should
have
been.
It
should
have
been
amazing
and
memorable
for
a
nearly
$700
+
tip
dinner
for
two,
and
it
did
not
even
meet
the
'mediocre'
bar.
High-quality,
luxury
ingredients
carefully
prepared
do
not
necessarily
equal
amazing
food.
Some
element
of
creativity
or
artistry
seems
to
be
missing
here;
I
don't
know
what
could
be.
We
have
eaten
at
other
Michelin-star
restaurants,
most
recently,
one
in
Prague
where
I
was
served
a
dessert
I
will
remember
fondly
until
the
day
I
die.
And
that
dinner
did
not
include
caviar,
foie
gras,
wagyu
or
any
type
of
'foam'
and
it
cost
a
fraction
of
these
nine
courses
of
disappointment.
The
first
course
-
Canapes,
came
out
and
looked
lovely,
but
all
were
a
blah
flavour.
The
components
did
not
seem
to
work
together;
nothing
tasted
special
at
all.
We
both
looked
at
each
other,
thinking...
"What??"
Two
successive
raw
fish
courses.
Nothing
special
or
memorable,
just
unimaginative
combinations
of
herb
oils;
one
was
too
vinegary
to
enjoy.
Then
a
chawanmushi
-
Japanese
egg
custard,
which
I
found
not
just
boring
but
somewhat
unpleasant
in
taste
and
texture.
The
fifth
course,
the
Chanterelle
Mushroom,
the
only
vegetable
to
be
found,
was
the
first
and
almost
only
thing
that
was
truly
delicious.
Covered
in,
if
I
recall
correctly,
a
butter
emulsion
sauce
of
some
sort.
(I
missed
about
a
third
of
what
the
servers
said
as
they
rambled
off
the
descriptions).
The
next
two
courses-
Hokkaido
Scallop
and
Koshihikari
Rice
were
good
and
had
I
been
dining
at
a
mid-to-high-priced
Asian
restaurant
rather
than
a
Michelin-star
French
restaurant,
I
might
have
been
somewhat
impressed.
The
Lamb
was
delicious
and
the
Striploin
was
just
okay.
The
dessert
was
the
final
let-down
as,
like
so
much
else
about
the
meal,
it
was
good
but
nothing
special.
A
Mango
Mousse
that
had
a
very
good
texture
and
was
nice
in
that
it
wasn't
too
sweet.
And
the
Petit
Fours....
embarrassingly
horrendous.
I
truly
cannot
understand
all
the
hype
about
this
restaurant.
I
know
that
1
star
is
harsh
but
in
all
honesty,
had
this
been
a
$200
dinner
I
might
have
given
it
a
3
and
just
not
gone
back
but
when
the
experience
is
so
painfully
far
below
the
cost
and
expectation,
1
star
is
generous.
1 person found this review helpful 👍