4/5 David P. 9 months ago on Google
As
mentioned
in
many
other
reviews:
The
exposition
is
simply
huge.
You
can
find
everything
from
metalurgy,
through
communication
and
multimedia,
to
the
aerospace
programme.
A
large
part
of
the
exposition
is
dedicated
to
work/employment
and
issues
related
to
women's
employment.
I
strongly
recommend
that
you
spend
a
whole
day
there
and
take
a
break
in
the
museum's
canteen.
It
is
not
very
cheap,
but
very
nice.
On
the
other
hand,
the
entrance
fee
is
really
low
compared
to
the
size
of
the
museum.
There
are
toilets
everywhere,
vending
machines
on
the
floors
and
you
can
lock
your
bags
next
to
the
entrance.
So
no
complaints
about
the
service.
However,
I
do
have
a
few
comments:
a)
We
visited
the
museum
on
a
hot
day
and
the
air
inside
was
quite
hot
and
humid.
But
I
understand
that
air
conditioning
such
a
large
building
would
be
expensive.
So
take
some
bottles
of
water
with
you.
b)
It
would
be
great
to
recommend
some
tours
for
people
who
don't
want
to
be
there
for
4+
hours.
(Or
did
I
miss
it?)
If
you
are
not
sure,
start
at
the
top.
Many
people
waste
too
much
time
on
metalurgy,
work
etc.
c)
I
like
the
exhibition
focusing
on
employment
and
especially
the
position
of
women.
(By
the
way,
the
museum
emphasises
the
influence
of
women
in
science
and
technology
several
times.
That's
really
great
and
helps
to
break
down
stereotypes).
It
is
rather
sad
that
in
the
middle
of
this
employment
exhibition,
which
focuses
on
breaking
down
stereotypes,
there
is
a
large
wooden
manager's
desk
with
a
lamp
and
the
description
that
the
vast
majority
of
top
management
positions
are
held
by
men.
Although
the
wording
itself
is
far
from
objective,
we
can
certainly
agree
with
it.
What
I
find
a
failure
is
the
second
part,
where
the
authors
describe
that
this
desk,
as
well
as
similar
ones,
is
completely
clean
because
"the
real
work"
is
done
elsewhere.
(Sorry
for
the
abridgment.)
The
phrase
quite
deliberately
suggests
that
top
managers
are
some
kind
of
leeches,
living
off
the
people
who
do
the
'real
work'.
As
a
member
of
the
economics
faculty,
I
dare
to
argue
that
such
suggestions
are
a
huge
misunderstanding
of
management.
As
the
grandson
of
a
communist
prisoner,
I'm
disturbed.
All
populist
regimes
have
one
thing
in
common:
There
is
a
part
of
society
that
is
unnecessarily
rich,
although
'we'
do
the
'real'
work.
History
clearly
shows
the
consequences.
So,
It
would
be
great
not
to
create
the
stereotype
that
all
higher
managers
are
old,
lazy,
fat
guys
who
just
play
golf
all
the
time.
If
we
are
trying
to
educate
new
generations.
They
should
be
free
of
such
old
stereotypes.
But,
maybe
the
museum
management
is
just
playing
the
golf...
;-)