5/5 K S. 2 years ago on Google
Let
me
start
by
saying
that
Zahav
is
a
very
good
restaurant.
The
food
that
I
ate
from
the
tasting
menu
was
well-prepared
and
in
most
cases
tasty,
and
the
service
was
good.
Is
Zahav
the
best
restaurant
in
the
country,
as
the
James
Beard
Foundation
has
called
it?
Probably
not,
but
this
doesn't
mean
you
shouldn't
visit.
The
concept
of
the
menu
is
based
on
shared
plates
that
better
convey
the
culture
of
the
region
Zahav's
cuisine
represents.
The
menu
starts
with
the
Laffa
bread,
some
hummus
with
green
tehina,
and
six
vegetables
salads.
All
had
an
interesting
neo-traditional
flavor
profile
that
I
enjoyed.
Moving
to
the
mezze,
the
haloumi
kataifi
was
the
star
of
them
all.
The
haloumi
was
baked
inside
the
kataifi
filo
and
was
accompanied
by
some
blueberries.
The
balance
of
the
dish
was
good,
with
this
dish
being
between
somewhere
between
savory
and
sweet,
without
being
either.
I
enjoyed
this
ambiguity
that
put
me
into
thinking
more
actively
about
this
dish
and
its
role
in
the
menu.
The
heirloom
tomatoes
with
feta
was
an
interesting
take
on
an
every-day
Greek
mezze
that
combines
feta
and
fresh,
ripe
tomatoes.
The
tomatoes
were
confit
with
a
crumble
on
top,
adding
an
extra
texture
to
this
dish.
We
had
a
fried
cauliflower
as
part
of
our
mezze,
which
I
didn't
appreciate
that
much.
Nothing
wrong
with
it,
but
nothing
extremely
interesting
either.
The
role
of
the
tuna
crudo
in
the
menu,
I
can't
understand.
While
I
see
variations
of
this
dish
in
various
menus
in
fine
dining
restaurants,
which
they
term
theirn
cuisine
"contemporary,"
I
am
not
sure
why
the
flavor
profile
of
this
dish
belongs
in
a
menu
that
focuses
on
playful/creative
representations
of
Israeli/Middle
eastern/Mediterranean
food.
Moving
to
the
Al
Ha'esh
part
of
the
menu,
this
is
the
point
I
am
getting
extremely
full
with
my
food.
I
like
tasting
menus
to
perform
just
that,
to
provide
me
with
a
wider
selection
of
tastes
and
cooking
techniques
from
that
restaurant.
If,
without
getting
additional
Laffa
bread,
I
am
moving
through
the
menu
and
I
am
getting
very
full
before
the
main
arrives,
then
I
can't
finish
my
tasting
experience.
I
do
like
value
for
money
always,
but
in
this
case
less
would
be
more.
In
the
Al
Ha'esh
section,
the
chicken
shishlik
was
tasty
and
juicy,
and
the
red
plum
matbucha
added
complexity
to
the
very
familiar
flavor
of
a
chicken
souvlaki.
While
the
sweet
potato
dish
was
good,
it
probably
needed
more
tartar
to
balance
the
elements
in
that
dish.
The
swordfish,
on
the
other
hand,
had
a
heavier
smell
that
I
didn't
appreciate.
I
was
good
without
this
dish,
and
it
really
took
away
from
my
entire
experience.
Going
to
our
main
dish,
our
pomegranate
lamb
shoulder
was
tender,
if
a
bit
dry,
but
the
pomegranate
and
the
mint
were
not
very
prominent
at
all,
flavor-wise.
I
honestly
couldn't
trace
them
anywhere.
Having
these
elements
to
stand
out
more,
they
would
have
provided
more
complexity
to
this
fundamental
dish
of
the
wider
region.
Moving
to
our
dessert,
both
the
cantaloupe
sorbet
and
the
malabi
were
tasty.
The
sorbet
was
more
impressive
to
me.
I
was
having
the
entire
tasting
experience
of
eating
the
fruit
itself,
with
all
the
flavors
and
nuances
of
a
ripe
cantaloupe,
while
going
through
the
sorbet.
The
malabi
was
tasty,
but
I
am
not
sure
it
needs
the
white
chocolate.
The
bay
leaf
and
the
peaches
were
really
overpowering
everything
else,
not
necessarily
in
a
bad
way,
but
not
in
a
positive
manner
either.
I
think
for
Zahav
less
could
be
more,
less
dishes,
in
certain
cases,
less
elements
in
certain
dishes.
I
want
something
more
cohesive
as
a
menu.
Also
the
louder
(RnB)
music
and
the
chatter
that
echoes
in
Zahav's
chambers
really
destroyed
the
ambiance
of
this
restaurant.
Sitting
there
and
going
through
their
tasting
menu
for
2h
I
prefer
an
environment
where
I
can
relax
and
enjoy.
Would
I
go
again.
Maybe,
maybe
not.
I
had
higher
expectations,
I
was
told
my
tastebuds
would
be
blown
away,
etc.
I
don't
think
this
happened
at
all.
Also
I
had
to
book
2
months
in
advance.