1/5 Tim L. 1 year ago on Google • 5 reviews
On
Wednesday
29-12-2021,
my
husband,
(who
is
my
Medical
and
Financial
Powers
of
Attorney
and
also
my
principal
supporting
care-giver)
accompanied
me
to
Caulfield
hospital
for
my
12:00am
(midday)
C.A.T.
scan
appointment
with
the
Imaging
Department
on
the
1st
floor.
My
husband
and
I
had
already
received
both
of
our
required
Pfizer
injections,
but
our
vaccination
documents,
although
perfectly
clear,
were
not
yet
in
the
customary
format.
Upon
request,
my
husband
produced
our
original
medical
certificates,
which
had
been
typed
on
‘Surgery-Headed’
notepaper
and
in
each
case
hand-signed
in
ink
by
our
GP,
Dr.
Belinda
Carne,
from
Inkerman
Medical
Group.
These
original
documents
had
thus
far
satisfied
all
medical
personnel
who
had
cause
to
inspect
them,
including
in
particular
the
same
staff
just
one
week
earlier
in
the
same
hospital
for
the
same
Covid
screening
process
in
the
same
foyer.
As
we
entered
the
foyer,
we
were
confronted
by
a
middle-aged
woman
called
Anna
in
a
nurse’s
uniform.
‘Anna’
declared
our
documents
to
be
obvious
forgeries
and
as
such
completely
unacceptable,
we
would
therefore
now
have
to
leave
the
hospital,
regardless
of
my
imminent
imaging
appointment.
My
husband
posed
the
question
to
her
as
to
how
this
state
of
affairs
could
possibly
exist
today,
when
only
one
week
before,
these
exact
same
documents
were
deemed
entirely
satisfactory
for
my
previous
imaging
appointment
at
the
same
hospital,
for
the
same
Covid
screening
procedure
and
in
the
same
foyer.
The
woman
ignored
the
question
and
ironically
began
commanding
my
husband
to
immediately
stop
shouting,
stop
pointing
his
finger,
take
control
over
himself
and
to
calm
himself
down.
My
husband
told
her
her
that
he
was
completely
calm,
that
this
is
how
he
normally
talks,
that
he
hadn’t
shouted
and
had
also
never
pointed
his
finger
at
her
or
at
anybody
else.
My
husband
then
endeavoured
to
ascertain
from
her
how
we
should
therefore
best
proceed
going
forward,
given
that
she
had
rejected
the
integrity
and
authenticity
of
our
documentation.
‘Anna’
once
again
offered
no
reply,
but
continued
unabated
with
the
same
‘mantra’
for
my
husband
to
calm
himself
down
and
to
stop
shouting,
with
renewed
vigour.
Every
time
that
my
husband
tried
to
ask
this
woman
a
question
or
establish
any
constructive
dialogue,
she
reacted
as
if
these
attempts
were
somehow
yet
more
‘proof’
of
my
husbands’
‘guilt’,
which
could
all
be
added
to
her
own
rapidly
expanding
‘mountain
of
evidence’
against
him.
‘Anna’
did
eventually
call
the
Inkerman
Medical
Group
and
although
we
didn’t
hear
what
transpired
in
that
conversation,
we
were
subsequently,
though
grudgingly
permitted
to
enter
the
hospital.
My
husband
successfully
managed
to
sustain
a
calm
and
cooperative
approach
throughout
the
entire
ordeal,
despite
the
relentless
stream
of
threats,
insults
and
false
accusations.
In
my
opinion,
toxic
behaviour,
and
especially
of
such
magnitude
from
this
particular
hospital
employee
(and
therefore
an
‘ambassador’
for
Caulfield
hospital)
is
not
only
unacceptable,
inexcusable,
hurtful,
unwarranted
and
deeply
offensive,
but
also
entirely
unproductive
and
manifestly
pointless.
By
complete
contrast,
this
woman
potentially
could
have
chosen
a
professional,
courteous
and
helpful
demeanour,
and
if
required,
could
have
advised
us
politely,
that
regarding
our
current
documentation,
it
would
be
a
great
help
to
the
staff
if
we
could
please
present
our
Covid
status
as
soon
as
possible
in
the
preferred
format
to
avoid
any
future
complications.
This
woman,
however
appeared
to
completely
luxuriate
in
her
empowered
position
of
denying
hospital
entry
for
any
Caulfield
community
residents
to
whom
she
had
decided
to
take
a
personal
dislike.
I
am
deeply
shocked
that
my
husband,
who
was
only
ever
at
the
hospital
because
he
wanted
to
assist
and
support
me,
should
have
been
‘rewarded’
for
his
kindness
to
me
by
being
singled
out
as
an
object
of
public
ridicule,
scorn,
humiliation,
and,
absent
one
single
shred
of
evidence,
falsely
accused
of
being
a
loud-mouthed,
angry
and
aggressive
troublemaker
with
forged
documents.
11 people found this review helpful 👍