1/5 Andreea N. 4 months ago on Google • 1 review
240
euro
paid
for
a
less
than
mediocre
composite
reconstruction.
It
is
a
big
amount
to
pay
for
such
an
unsatisfactory
result.
In
my
opinion
the
work
should
be
flawless
if
a
patient
pays
this
much.The
doctor
kept
saying
he
does
not
see
the
stains
on
my
tooth
and
he
does
not
understand
where
my
dental
sensitivity
is
coming
from.
He
really
did
not
understand
how
the
morphology
of
the
tooth
was
not
right
(a
lot
of
enamel
was
missing
especially
inter-proximally)
which
made
me
lose
confidence
in
his
dental
aesthetic
abilities.
I
tried
to
appreciate
that
he
offered
to
fix
my
tooth
a
second
time
for
free,
but
the
result
was
worse.
The
form
of
the
tooth
was
not
right;
I
had
lint
stuck
in
the
excessive
composite
material
used;
the
colour
of
the
material
was
not
matching
my
natural
teeth
colour;
pain
and
sensitivity
still
present;
my
premolar
looked
like
a
canine.
He
suggested
a
root
canal
treatment
when
I
told
him
my
pain
and
sensitivity
were
still
present
and
at
that
point
he
did
not
know
what
to
do.
In
my
case,
it
turned
out
he
did
not
have
an
eye
for
details
and
for
symmetric
dentistry.
I
am
glad
I
asked
for
a
second
opinion
and
it
turned
out
that
apart
from
a
loss
of
enamel
my
tooth
was
longer
because
of
a
visible
gum
recession,
which
mandates
a
gum
graft.
My
tooth
was
beautifully
reconstructed
by
another
doctor
(last
picture).
I
thought
that
paying
this
much
money
came
along
with
qualitative
results,
but
I
ended
up
just
being
stressed
and
unsatisfied
of
the
result
and
having
to
undergo
treatment
at
a
different
clinic.
I
think
doctors
underestimate
the
suffering
a
patient
goes
through
when
such
an
unfortunate
thing
happens.
P.S:
I
am
still
waiting
for
the
promised
refund.