5/5 Adrian Dan P. 4 years ago on Google
(Translated
by
Google)
With
an
existence
that
spans
six
centuries
(1391
-
the
patriarchal
act
of
Patriarch
Antony
of
Constantinople,
by
which
the
Peri
monastery
in
Maramures
becomes
Stavropighie
and
reminiscent
of
the
existence
of
"local
archives"),
the
Episcopate
of
Maramures
has
had
an
extremely
troubled
history.
.
Despite
the
strong
faith
of
the
Maramures
and
their
attachment
to
Orthodoxy,
they
did
not
have
a
well-established
church
organization,
which
would
not
be
vulnerable
to
transient
administrations,
who
always
denied
and
suppressed
their
rights.
After
the
year
1705,
when
Bishop
Joseph
the
Confessor
of
Maramures
is
thrown
into
prison,
the
Holy
Synod
of
the
B.O.R.
he
canonized
it
in
1992,
at
the
proposal
of
P.S.
Bishop
Justinian
Chira,
the
episcopal
seat
of
the
Maramures
Hierarchs
was
not
in
a
particular
place
and
was
not
in
an
urban
center.
Most
often
he
was
in
a
monastery
(eg
Barsana),
and
the
bishop
was
what
the
professor
and
historian
Mircea
Pacurariu
calls
in
the
History
of
the
Romanian
Orthodox
Church
-
horepiscop
(meaning
country
bishop).
The
Maramures
voivodeship
tried,
and
often
succeeded,
to
overthrow
higher
church
centers
near
their
courtyard,
but
due
to
the
historical
circumstances
and
geopolitical
space
to
which
the
Maramures
belonged
and
the
Austro-Hungarian
Empire's
interest
in
these
lands,
Maram
voivode
Bogdan
from
Cuh
of
the
most
representative,
he
was
forced
to
leave
his
beloved
Maramures
and
to
go
on
a
privilege
over
the
mountains,
where
he
lays
the
foundations
of
the
state
of
Moldova
-
1359.
From
1739
-
with
the
last
Orthodox
bishop
mentioned
by
name
and
until
1937,
Maramures
was
not
allowed
to
have
an
Orthodox
bishop
due
to
the
union,
which
was
a
political
action
imposed.
In
1700
the
Romanians
were
declared
united
without
being
consulted,
and
if
they
dared
to
raise
their
voice,
the
repressions
were
so
violent
and
inhuman
that
they
resigned
in
the
new
situation.
Declared
united
in
the
mass,
so
formally,
in
reality
they
held
on
to
their
ancestors
'and
ancestors'
traditions
of
what
they
were
before
-
Orthodox.
The
last
two
censuses,
from
1992
and
2002,
prove
how
clear
this
can
be.
(Original)
Cu
o
existenta
ce
se
intinde
pe
parcursul
a
sase
secole
(1391
–
actul
patriarhal
al
patriarhului
Antonie
al
Constantinopolului,
prin
care
manastirea
Peri
din
Maramures
devine
Stavropighie
si
unde
aminteste
de
existenta
"arhiereilor
locali"),
Episcopia
Maramuresului
a
avut
o
istorie
extrem
de
zbuciumata.
In
pofida
credintei
puternice
a
maramuresenilor
si
atasamentului
lor
fata
de
Ortodoxie,
ei
n-au
avut
parte
de
o
organizare
bisericeasca
bine
asezata,
care
sa
nu
fie
vulnerabila
unor
administratii
trecatoare,
care
i-au
negat
si
suprimat
intotdeauna
drepturile.
Dupa
anul
1705,
cand
este
aruncat
in
inchisoare
episcopul
Iosif
Marturisitorul
din
Maramures,
pe
care
Sfantul
Sinod
al
B.O.R.
l-a
canonizat
in
1992,
la
propunerea
P.S.
Episcop
Justinian
Chira,
scaunul
episcopal
al
ierarhilor
de
Maramures
nu
era
intr-un
loc
anume
si
mai
cu
seama
nu
era
intr-un
centru
urban.
Cel
mai
adesea
era
intr-o
manastire
(ex.
Barsana),
iar
episcopul
era
ceea
ce
profesorul
si
istoricul
Mircea
Pacurariu
numeste
in
Istoria
Bisericii
Ortodoxe
Romane
–
horepiscop
(
adica
episcop
de
tara).
Voievozii
maramureseni
au
incercat,
si
adesea
au
reusit,
sa
infiripeze
centre
bisericesti
superioare
pe
langa
curtea
lor,
insa
datorita
imprejurarilor
istorice
si
spatiului
geopolitic
caruia
apartinea
Maramuresul
si
a
interesului
Imperiului
Austro
-
Ungar
fata
de
aceste
meleaguri,
insusi
voievodul
Bogdan
din
Cuhea
Maramuresului,
unul
dintre
cei
mai
reprezentativi,
a
fost
nevoit
sa-si
paraseasca
Maramuresul
drag
si
sa
plece
in
pribegie
peste
munti,
unde
pune
bazele
statului
Moldova
–
1359.
Din
1739
–
cu
ultimul
episcop
ortodox
amintit
cu
numele
si
pana
in
1937,
Maramuresului
nu
i-a
fost
ingaduit
sa
aiba
episcop
ortodox
datorita
uniatiei,
care
a
fost
o
actiune
politica
impusa.
La
1700
romanii
au
fost
declarati
uniti
fara
sa
fie
consultati,
iar
daca
au
indraznit
sa-si
ridice
glasul,
represiunile
erau
atat
de
violente
si
inumane
incat
acestia
s-au
resemnat
in
noua
situatie.
Declarati
uniti
in
masa,
deci
in
mod
formal,
in
realitate
ei
tineau
mai
departe
datina
mosilor
si
stramosilor
lor
ceea
ce
au
fost
inainte
- ortodocsi.
Ultimele
doua
recensaminte,
din
1992
si
2002,
dovedesc
cat
se
poate
de
clar
acest
lucru.
5 people found this review helpful 👍
