1/5 Wolfgang H. 3 years ago on Google
It
has
been
the
second
visit
to
the
museum,
and
I
became
acutely
aware
that
this
museum
has
some
peculiar
properties.
I
would
expect
that
a
museum
that
aims
to
explain
the
history
of
the
native
polulation
prior
to
Spanish
Colonialisation,
would
present
artifacts
in
chonologic
order,
i.e,
early
settlements,
high
culture,
colonialisation.
Instead,
the
museum
displays
artefacts
by
function.
There
is
a
room
for
pottery
shards
and
vessles,
one
for
clothing,
one
of
stone
tools
and
one
for
human
remains
etc.
None
of
these
are
dated,
put
into
social,
historic,
religious
or
developmental
stages.
On
the
landing
of
the
first
floor
e.g.,there
is
an
exhibit
showing
the
effects
of
diet
(cereal
consumption
leads
to
caries,
legume
and
pulse
consuption
to
dental
erosion).
If
this
exhibit
was
dated
post
colonialisation,
then
the
interpretation
is
vastly
different
than
if
was
dated
long
before
colonialisation.
If
we
apply
this
critical
thinking
now
to
the
entire
exhibition,
then
categorising
pottery
into
"simple",
"advanced"
or
"complex"
shapes
becomes
an
equally
questionable
practice.
So
I
left
the
museum
with
the
question
if
the
real
purpose
is
to
pay
lip
service
to
the
people,
their
way
of
live,
culture
and
religion,
in
order
to
gloss
over
the
consequence
that
coloialisation
was
a
strategic
geographic
gain
for
Spain,
spelled
death,
suffering
and
extinction
to
the
native
population.
1 person found this review helpful 👍