5/5 Saebin Y. 2 years ago on Google
I
visited
this
emergency
room
last
night
after
attempting
to
get
similar
testing
at
different
emergency
room
the
night
before.
I
wasn't
served
by
that
room
because
they
didn't
believe
it
was
urgent
enough.
But
two
urgent
care
facilities
over
the
weekend
couldn't
perform
the
test,
so
I
found
myself
checking
into
another
ER,
hoping
this
time,
things
would
go
better.
For
a
non-emergency
or
urgent
care
need,
Banner
may
not
be
the
quickest,
but
if
you're
patient,
the
waiting
room
is
spacious
and
comfortable.
There's
free
wifi,
and
if
you
find
yourself
starving
during
the
wait,
the
staff
is
ready
with
recommendations
of
nearby
eateries.
I
would
recommend
anyone
go
to
Banner.
I
think
the
staff
are
professional
and
willing,
and
capable
of
asking
thoughtful
questions.
Banner
got
a
lot
of
things
right
yesterday.
Still,
I
know
ERs
talk
to
each
other.
I
suspect
the
only
quibble
I
have
with
my
experience
is
because
of
that
communication.
I
work
in
a
field
that
often
feel
at
odds
with
the
people
we
serve.
While
other
levels
of
carers
at
Banner
gave
no
judgment
or
negativity,
I
did
sense
it
from
the
doctor
who
saw
me.
I
won't
hold
it
against
her
(5-star
review),
because
I
understand
solidarity
among
professionals.
But
since
I
think
this
review
may
have
a
chance
of
getting
shared,
I
would
like
to
provide
feedback
of
how
Banner
and
other
medical
facilities
might
consider
fostering
a
more
supportive
culture
for
patients.
I
am
not
speaking
as
any
kind
of
medical
professional.
My
education
is
in
political
systems,
and
I
have
made
ethics
a
huge
focus
of
my
life.
Doctors
take
an
oath
to
"do
no
harm"
to
their
patients.
From
this
pillar
of
medical
practice,
I
would
like
to
offer
the
following
thoughts...
1)
I
would
like
doctors
to
consider
they
are
morally
obligated
to
ensure
care
when
appropriate
to
both
prevent
disability
and
maintain
a
patient's
employment.
I
might
suggest
simply
"making
sure
a
patient
doesn't
die"
is
a
very
low
standard
of
care
--
at
the
very
least
from
a
moral
perspective.
2)
In
addition
to
#1,
perhaps
when
patients
share
these
worries,
mocking
or
scoffing
is
not
appropriate.
It
fails
show
empathy
and
refuses
to
take
responsibility
in
relating
with
patients.
It
exemplifies
a
bullying
mindset,
which
is
"doing
harm"
by
definition.
3)
Maybe
doctors
shouldn't
consider
a
patient
coming
to
an
ER
"for
insufficiently
urgent
reasons"
a
moral
ground
to
deny
care
or
shame
a
patient
for
coming
in.
4)
Maybe
when
a
patient
has
a
long-term
concern
difficult
to
pin
down
with
multiple
providers,
doctors
might
consider
*that*
a
potentially
emergency-related
issue.
Many
potential
life-threatening
problems
need
to
be
diagnosed
early
to
prevent
disability
or
death.
An
ER
doctor
is
functionally
a
highly-skilled
PCP
who
is
able
to
review
the
whole
body
with
hospital-level
resources
to
examine,
assess,
and
identify
serious
illness.
This
service
is
compensated
at
a
much
higher
level
than
a
PCP
doctor,
specialty
provider,
or
urgent
care
clinic
can
obtain.
It's
difficult
for
me
to
see
when
a
patient
presents
themselves
willing
to
pay
this
markup
for
care,
after
trying
to
resolve
this
issue
with
a
dozen
providers,
how
an
ER
doctor
justifies
that
patient
is
not
their
problem.
Because
of
my
experience
with
both
ER
doctors,
I
did
not
inquire
about
an
MRI
that
had
been
ordered
by
an
ENT
that
I
had
seen.
The
MRI
could
have
identified
a
serious
condition
a
specialist
had
expressed
concern
about.
It
was
also
related
to
what
I
had
requested
care
for.
I
believe
that
a
best
practice
in
a
circumstance
like
this,
is
for
the
ER
doc
to
do
the
MRI.
This
isn't
a
license
for
patients
to
knock
the
door
down
just
to
do
MRIs.
The
patient
is
already
in
a
place
where
an
MRI
can
be
performed,
the
facility
makes
money,
and
it
contributes
to
preventing
harm.
It
also
reduces
the
patient's
travel
to
a
separate
facility.
I
would
encourage
administrators
and
medical
professionals
to
consider
modifying
their
expectations
of
care.